Comment on "Higher Order Pancharatnam-Berry Phase and the Angular Momentum of Light"
Masato Suzuki, Keisaku Yamane, Kazuhiko Oka, Yasunori Toda, and Ryuji, Morita

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent study on the Pancharatnam-Berry phase, clarifying that the spin-orbit converters used do not produce a true path on the higher-order Poincaré sphere, and discusses how to properly acquire the phase.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis of the previous work and offers insights into correctly obtaining the Pancharatnam-Berry phase with spin-orbit converters.
Findings
SOCs do not generate a path on the HOPS as previously claimed.
Proper acquisition of PBP requires specific trajectory considerations.
Clarification of the relationship between SOCs and the HOPS.
Abstract
In a recent letter, Milione et al. reported the Pancharatnam-Berry phase (PBP) on a higher-order Poincar\'e sphere (HOPS) [Phys. Rev. Lett, 108, 190401 (2012)]. They used two spin-orbit converters (SOCs) to make a trajectory along the HOPS. However, the SOCs actually do not make a path on the HOPS. We briefly discuss a way of acquiring a PBP made by SOCs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMolecular spectroscopy and chirality · Advanced Mathematical Theories and Applications · Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
