Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries
Abhirup Ghosh, Archisman Ghosh, Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel, Chandra, Kant Mishra, Parameswaran Ajith, Walter Del Pozzo, David A. Nichols, Yanbei, Chen, Alex B. Nielsen, Christopher P. L. Berry, Lionel London

TL;DR
This paper proposes a Bayesian method to test general relativity by comparing independent estimates of black hole parameters from gravitational wave signals, demonstrating its effectiveness with simulated data and outlining future observational constraints.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian framework for testing GR using multiple GW observations and independent parameter estimates from inspiral and merger-ringdown signals.
Findings
The test can detect significant deviations from GR with current models.
Simulations show the method's potential with upcoming GW detector data.
Constraints on deviations improve with multiple observations.
Abstract
The coalescences of stellar-mass black-hole binaries through their inspiral, merger, and ringdown are among the most promising sources for ground-based gravitational-wave (GW) detectors. If a GW signal is observed with sufficient signal-to-noise ratio, the masses and spins of the black holes can be estimated from just the inspiral part of the signal. Using these estimates of the initial parameters of the binary, the mass and spin of the final black hole can be uniquely predicted making use of general-relativistic numerical simulations. In addition, the mass and spin of the final black hole can be independently estimated from the merger--ringdown part of the signal. If the binary black hole dynamics is correctly described by general relativity (GR), these independent estimates have to be consistent with each other. We present a Bayesian implementation of such a test of general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
