Stability analysis of pressure correction schemes for the Navier-Stokes equations with traction boundary conditions
Sanghyun Lee, Abner J. Salgado

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the stability of two pressure correction schemes for Navier-Stokes equations with traction boundary conditions, establishing conditions for unconditional and conditional stability through theoretical analysis.
Contribution
It provides the first stability analysis of rotational pressure correction schemes with traction boundary conditions, including an unconditional stability result for a stabilized scheme.
Findings
The rotational scheme is unconditionally stable with proper stabilization.
A conditional stability result is established for the boundary correction scheme.
Stability is proven using the equivalence between gauge Uzawa methods and pressure correction schemes.
Abstract
We present a stability analysis for two different rotational pressure correction schemes with open and traction boundary conditions. First, we provide a stability analysis for a rotational version of the grad-div stabilized scheme of [A. Bonito, J.-L. Guermond, and S. Lee. Modified pressure-correction projection methods: Open boundary and variable time stepping. In Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications - ENUMATH 2013, volume 103 of Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, pages 623-631. Springer, 2015]. This scheme turns out to be unconditionally stable, provided the stabilization parameter is suitably chosen. We also establish a conditional stability result for the boundary correction scheme presented in [E. Bansch. A finite element pressure correction scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations with traction boundary condition. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
