On the inconsistency between cosmic stellar mass density and star formation rate up to $z\sim8$
H. Yu, F. Y. Wang (NJU)

TL;DR
This study investigates the inconsistency between observed stellar mass density and star formation rate up to redshift 8, revealing discrepancies at certain redshifts and discussing potential causes.
Contribution
First to use Markov chain Monte Carlo and a varying recycling factor to analyze the stellar mass density and star formation rate discrepancy up to z~8.
Findings
Observed stellar mass densities are lower than those implied by star formation history at z<4.
At 0.5<z<6, observed star formation rates are higher than the best-fit history, especially at z~2.
Derived star formation history aligns with observations at z<0.5 and z>6.
Abstract
In this paper, we test the discrepancy between the stellar mass density and instantaneous star formation rate in redshift range using a large observational data sample. We first compile the measurements of the stellar mass densities up to . Comparing the observed stellar mass densities with the time-integral of instantaneous star formation history, we find that the observed stellar mass densities are lower than that implied from star formation history at . We also use Markov chain monte carlo method to derive the best-fitting star formation history from the observed stellar mass density data. At , the observed star formation rate densities are larger than the best-fitting one, especially at where by a factor of about two. However, at lower () and higher redshifts (), the derived star formation history is consistent with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
