The dust environment of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta OSIRIS and VLT observations in the 4.5 to 2.9 au heliocentric distance range inbound
F. Moreno, C. Snodgrass, O. Hainaut, C. Tubiana, H. Sierks, C., Barbieri, P. L. Lamy, R. Rodrigo, D. Koschny, H. Rickman, H. U. Keller, J., Agarwal, M. F. AHearn, M. A. Barucci, J.L. Bertaux, I. Bertini, S. Besse, D., Bodewits, G. Cremonese, V. Da Deppo, B. Davidsson, S. Debei

TL;DR
This study combines in situ Rosetta measurements with ground-based VLT observations to accurately characterize the dust environment of comet 67P, revealing how dust production varies with heliocentric distance and the properties of dust grains.
Contribution
It integrates spacecraft data with ground-based imaging using a Monte Carlo model to constrain dust properties and production rates, providing a comprehensive view of the comet's dust environment.
Findings
Dust production rate increases from 0.5 kg/s at 4.3 au to 15 kg/s at 2.9 au.
Dust size distribution index is -3 for grains smaller than 1 mm.
Dust-to-gas mass ratio varies between 3.8 and 6.5.
Abstract
The ESA Rosetta spacecraft, currently orbiting around comet 67P, has already provided in situ measurements of the dust grain properties from several instruments, particularly OSIRIS and GIADA. We propose adding value to those measurements by combining them with ground-based observations of the dust tail to monitor the overall, time-dependent dust-production rate and size distribution. To constrain the dust grain properties, we take Rosetta OSIRIS and GIADA results into account, and combine OSIRIS data during the approach phase (from late April to early June 2014) with a large data set of ground-based images that were acquired with the ESO Very Large Telescope (VLT) from February to November 2014. A Monte Carlo dust tail code has been applied to retrieve the dust parameters. Key properties of the grains (density, velocity, and size distribution) were obtained from Rosetta observations:…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
