Size evolution of star-forming galaxies with $2<z<4.5$ in the VIMOS Ultra-Deep Survey
B. Ribeiro, O. Le F\`evre, L. A. M. Tasca, B. C. Lemaux, P. Cassata,, B. Garilli, D. Maccagni, G. Zamorani, E. Zucca, R. Amor\'in, S. Bardelli, A., Fontana, M. Giavalisco, N.P. Hathi, A. Koekemoer, J. Pforr, L. Tresse, J., Dunlop

TL;DR
This study measures the sizes of star-forming galaxies between redshifts 2 and 4.5 using both parametric and non-parametric methods, revealing that non-parametric sizes remain constant while parametric sizes decrease with redshift, indicating complex galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It introduces a non-parametric size measurement approach that overcomes limitations of traditional parametric fitting, providing new insights into galaxy size evolution at high redshift.
Findings
Non-parametric sizes remain roughly constant across redshifts.
Parametric sizes significantly underestimate galaxy sizes at high redshift.
Larger galaxies tend to be more massive and star-forming.
Abstract
We measure galaxy sizes on a sample of galaxies with confirmed spectroscopic redshifts in the VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey (VUDS), representative of star-forming galaxies with . We first derive galaxy sizes applying a classical parametric profile fitting method using GALFIT. We then measure the total pixel area covered by a galaxy above a given surface brightness threshold, which overcomes the difficulty of measuring sizes of galaxies with irregular shapes. We then compare the results obtained for the equivalent circularized radius enclosing 100\% of the measured galaxy light to those obtained with the effective radius measured with GALFIT. We find that the sizes of galaxies computed with our non-parametric approach span a large range but remain roughly constant on average with a median value…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
