Resolved Companions of Cepheids: Testing the Candidates with X-Ray Observations
Nancy Remage Evans, Ignazio Pillitteri, Scott Wolk, Margarita, Karovska, Evan Tingle, Edward Guinan, Scott Engle, Howard E. Bond, Gail H., Schaefer, and Brian D. Mason

TL;DR
This study used X-ray observations to test whether candidate resolved companions of Cepheids are young stars, confirming only one as a likely physical companion or cluster member, and suggesting some X-ray emissions originate from the Cepheids themselves.
Contribution
First X-ray survey of candidate Cepheid companions, providing a method to confirm physical association and distinguishing between cluster members and true companions.
Findings
Most candidate companions are not X-ray sources, indicating they are not young stars.
One candidate companion (S Nor #4) is likely a cluster member, not a bound companion.
X-ray emissions in some cases originate from the Cepheids themselves or close unresolved companions.
Abstract
We have made {\it XMM-Newton\/} observations of 14 Galactic Cepheids that have candidate resolved (5) companion stars based on our earlier {\it HST\/} WFC3 imaging survey. Main-sequence stars that are young enough to be physical companions of Cepheids are expected to be strong X-ray producers in contrast to field stars. {\it XMM-Newton\/} exposures were set to detect essentially all companions hotter than spectral type M0 (corresponding to 0.5 .) The large majority of our candidate companions were not detected in X-rays, and hence are not confirmed as young companions. One resolved candidate (S~Nor \#4) was unambiguously detected, but the Cepheid is a member of a populous cluster. For this reason, it is likely that S~Nor \#4 is a cluster member rather than a gravitationally bound companion. Two further Cepheids (S~Mus and R~Cru) have X-ray emission that might be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
