Comments on 'Phonon and magnetic structure in {\delta}-plutonium from density-functional theory' by P. S\"oderlind et al
M. Janoschek (1), G. H. Lander (2), J. M. Lawrence (1), E. D. Bauer, (1), M. D. Lumsden (3), D. L. Abernathy (3), and J. D. Thompson (1) ((1) Los, Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, USA, (2) European Commission,, Joint Research Centre

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on delta-plutonium, focusing on the magnetic structure aspect, highlighting that the original comparison with experimental data overlooked key experimental facts.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary on the interpretation of neutron spectroscopy data in the context of DFT calculations for delta-plutonium's magnetic structure.
Findings
Highlights overlooked experimental facts in neutron spectroscopy data
Questions the validity of previous DFT-based magnetic form factor comparisons
Emphasizes the need for comprehensive analysis of experimental data
Abstract
In their recent paper [S\"oderlind, P. et al., Sci. Rep. 5, 15958 (2015)], S\"oderlind et al. discuss two subjects from a theoretical point of view: the phonon spectra and the possible magnetic structure of {\delta}-plutonium (Pu). Here, we comment on the second subject. S\"oderlind et al. compare the Pu magnetic form factor F(Q) calculated via density functional theory (DFT) with measurements of F(Q) by neutron spectroscopy [Janoschek, M. et al., Sci. Adv. 1, e1500188 (2015)]. In particular, this comparison does not consider a number of experimental facts established in the neutron spectroscopy study.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRare-earth and actinide compounds · Nuclear physics research studies · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
