The Zero Active Mass Condition in Friedmann-Robertson-Walker Cosmologies

TL;DR

This paper clarifies that the universe's expansion rate and the zero active mass condition are consistent with general relativity, refuting recent counterarguments based on frame misinterpretations.

Contribution

It demonstrates that the zero active mass condition (rho+3p=0) is fundamental for FRW cosmologies and corrects misconceptions about frame choices and time dilation effects.

Findings

The Hubble flow is not inertial when rho+3p≠0.

Incorrect frame assumptions lead to misunderstandings of time dilation.

The zero active mass condition aligns with FRW symmetry and general relativity.

Abstract

Many cosmological measurements today suggest that the Universe is expanding at a constant rate. This is inferred from the observed age versus redshift relationship and various distance indicators, all of which point to a cosmic equation of state (EoS) p=-rho/3, where rho and p are, respectively, the total energy density and pressure of the cosmic fluid. It has recently been shown that this result is not a coincidence and simply confirms the fact that the symmetries in the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric appear to be viable only for a medium with zero active mass, i.e., rho+3p=0. In their latest paper, however, Kim, Lasenby and Hobson have provided what they believe to be a counter argument to this conclusion. Here, we show that these authors are merely repeating the conventional mistake of incorrectly placing the observer simultaneously in a comoving frame, where the lapse function g_tt is coordinate dependent when rho+3p is not 0, and a supposedly different, free-falling frame, in which g_tt=1, implying no time dilation. We demonstrate that the Hubble flow is not inertial when rho+3p is not 0, so the comoving frame is generally not in free fall, even though in FRW, the comoving and free-falling frames are supposed to be identical at every spacetime point. So this confusion of frames not only constitutes an inconsistency with the fundamental tenets of general relativity but, additionally, there is no possibility of using a gauge transformation to select a set of coordinates for which g_tt=1 when rho+3p is not 0.