Why Super-Quantum, Non-Signaling Correlations Cannot Exist
Pierre Uzan

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that super-quantum, non-signaling correlations cannot exist because physically realizable no-signaling systems must be described using quantum-like operator language, which enforces the Tsirelson bound.
Contribution
It clarifies the misconception that stronger-than-quantum no-signaling correlations can exist by showing they require a quantum-like operator framework, leading to the Tsirelson bound.
Findings
Super-quantum correlations are incompatible with quantum operator formalism.
No-signaling systems involving incompatible observables are described by non-commutative operators.
The Tsirelson bound naturally arises from the quantum-like description, ruling out stronger correlations.
Abstract
The idea that non-local correlations stronger than quantum correlations between two no-signaling systems could theoretically exist is based on an incorrect statistical interpretation of the no-signaling condition. This article shows that any physically realizable no-signaling box involving local incompatible observables indeed requires to be described in a non-commutative, quantum-like language of operators -which leads to the derivation of the Tsirelson bound and then contradicts this idea.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Biofield Effects and Biophysics
