Non accelerated efficient numerical methods for sparse quadratic optimization problems and its generalizations
Anton Anikin, Alexander Gasnikov, Alexander Gornov

TL;DR
This paper compares non-accelerated primal gradient and conditional gradient methods for sparse quadratic optimization, showing they can outperform accelerated methods in certain cases and exploring their generalizations.
Contribution
It demonstrates that non-accelerated primal and conditional gradient methods can be more effective than accelerated approaches for specific sparse quadratic problems and discusses their extensions.
Findings
Non-accelerated methods can outperform accelerated ones in some sparse quadratic cases
Primal gradient and conditional gradient methods are effective for certain problem classes
The paper explores generalizations of these methods
Abstract
We investigate primal gradient method with l1-norm and conditional gradient method (both methods are non accelerated). We show that these methods can outperform well known accelerated approaches for some classes of sparse quadratic problems. Moreover we discuss some generalizations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Matrix Theory and Algorithms · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
