Portfolio Selection: The Power of Equal Weight
Philip Ernst, James Thompson, Yinsen Miao

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that an equally weighted S&P 500 portfolio outperforms the traditional market cap weighted portfolio, and introduces the MaxMedian rule, which further surpasses the equal weight strategy over a long historical period.
Contribution
It empirically compares equal weighting and market cap weighting, and introduces the MaxMedian rule, a simple, non-proprietary investment strategy that outperforms traditional methods.
Findings
Equal weight portfolio outperforms market cap weighted portfolio.
MaxMedian rule beats equal weight portfolio over 1958-2016.
MaxMedian provides a simple, effective investment approach.
Abstract
We empirically show the superiority of the equally weighted S\&P 500 portfolio over Sharpe's market capitalization weighted S\&P 500 portfolio. We proceed to consider the MaxMedian rule, a non-proprietary rule designed for the investor who wishes to do his/her own investing on a laptop with the purchase of only 20 stocks. Rather surprisingly, over the 1958-2016 horizon, the cumulative returns of MaxMedian beat those of the equally weighted S\&P 500 portfolio by a factor of 1.15.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies · Risk and Portfolio Optimization · Housing Market and Economics
