Small-sample testing inference in symmetric and log-symmetric linear regression models
Francisco M.C. Medeiros, Silvia L.P.Ferrari

TL;DR
This paper develops Bartlett-type corrections for hypothesis tests in symmetric and log-symmetric linear regression models, improving small-sample accuracy and matching bootstrap performance without intensive computation.
Contribution
It derives a new Bartlett-type correction for the gradient test and demonstrates its effectiveness in small samples for symmetric and log-symmetric models.
Findings
Corrected tests have size closer to nominal levels.
Corrected tests perform as well as bootstrap tests.
Analytical corrections avoid intensive computations.
Abstract
This paper deals with the issue of testing hypothesis in symmetric and log-symmetric linear regression models in small and moderate-sized samples. We focus on four tests, namely the Wald, likelihood ratio, score, and gradient tests. These tests rely on asymptotic results and are unreliable when the sample size is not large enough to guarantee a good agreement between the exact distribution of the test statistic and the corresponding chi-squared asymptotic distribution. Bartlett and Bartlett-type corrections typically attenuate the size distortion of the tests. These corrections are available in the literature for the likelihood ratio and score tests in symmetric linear regression models. Here, we derive a Bartlett-type correction for the gradient test. We show that the corrections are also valid for the log-symmetric linear regression models. We numerically compare the various tests,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
