How to improve accuracy for DFA technique
Alessandro Stringhi, Silvia Figini

TL;DR
This paper investigates how various parameters in Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA) affect the accuracy of estimating the Hurst exponent, using Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate confidence intervals.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of how DFA parameters influence the accuracy of H estimation, offering guidance for parameter selection.
Findings
Parameters like time length L and number of divisors d significantly impact accuracy.
Monte Carlo simulations effectively evaluate confidence intervals for DFA.
Optimal parameter choices improve the reliability of Hurst exponent estimation.
Abstract
This paper extends the existing literature on empirical estimation of the confidence intervals associated to the Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA). We used Montecarlo simulation to evaluate the confidence intervals. Varying the parameters in DFA technique, we point out the relationship between those and the standard deviation of H. The parameters considered are the finite time length L, the number of divisors d used and the values of those. We found that all these parameters play a crucial role, determining the accuracy of the estimation of H.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Fractal and DNA sequence analysis · Theoretical and Computational Physics
