Contextuality without nonlocality in a superconducting quantum system
Markus Jerger, Yarema Reshitnyk, Markus Oppliger, Anton Poto\v{c}nik,, Mintu Mondal, Andreas Wallraff, Kenneth Goodenough, Stephanie Wehner,, Kristinn Juliusson, Nathan K. Langford, and Arkady Fedorov

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates state-dependent contextuality in a superconducting qutrit, providing experimental evidence against noncontextual realism and highlighting the potential of superconducting circuits for fault-tolerant quantum computing.
Contribution
It presents the first loophole-free violation of a noncontextuality inequality using a superconducting qutrit, advancing quantum foundations and quantum computing.
Findings
Violates a noncontextuality inequality with a superconducting qutrit
Addresses detection, individual-existence, and compatibility loopholes
Shows superconducting circuits are suitable for fault-tolerant quantum computation
Abstract
Classical realism demands that system properties exist independently of whether they are measured, while noncontextuality demands that the results of measurements do not depend on what other measurements are performed in conjunction with them. The Bell-Kochen-Specker theorem states that noncontextual realism cannot reproduce the measurement statistics of a single three-level quantum system (qutrit). Noncontextual realistic models may thus be tested using a single qutrit without relying on the notion of quantum entanglement in contrast to Bell inequality tests. It is challenging to refute such models experimentally, since imperfections may introduce loopholes that enable a realist interpretation. Here we use a superconducting qutrit with deterministic, binary-outcome readouts to violate a noncontextuality inequality while addressing the detection, individual-existence and compatibility…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
