Role of epistasis on the fixation probability of a non-mutator in an adapted asexual population
Ananthu James

TL;DR
This study analytically investigates how epistatic interactions influence the likelihood of a non-mutator fixing in an adapted asexual population, revealing that antagonistic and synergistic epistasis have opposite effects.
Contribution
It provides an analytical framework for understanding the impact of epistasis on mutation rate reduction in asexual populations, highlighting the non-monotonic behavior of fixation probability.
Findings
Antagonistic epistasis lowers fixation probability.
Synergistic epistasis increases fixation probability.
Fixation probability exhibits non-monotonic behavior below a critical epistasis value.
Abstract
The mutation rate of a well adapted population is prone to reduction so as to have a lower mutational load. We aim to understand the role of epistatic interactions between the fitness affecting mutations in this process. Using a multitype branching process, the fixation probability of a single non-mutator emerging in a large asexual mutator population is analytically calculated here. The mutator population undergoes deleterious mutations at constant, but at a much higher rate than that of the non-mutator. We find that antagonistic epistasis lowers the chances of mutation rate reduction, while synergistic epistasis enhances it. Below a critical value of epistasis, the fixation probability behaves non-monotonically with variation in mutation rate of the background population. Moreover, the variation of this critical value of the epistasis parameter with the strength of the mutator is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
