Predicting Human Cooperation
John J. Nay, Yevgeniy Vorobeychik

TL;DR
This paper introduces a comprehensive computational model that predicts human cooperation in repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games by integrating data from numerous experiments, effectively capturing diverse behaviors and informing strategies to promote cooperation.
Contribution
It presents the first unified, data-driven computational model of human behavior in repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, capable of predicting actions across various experimental conditions.
Findings
Model accurately predicts individual and group behavior
Successfully generalizes to new experimental setups
Provides insights for promoting cooperation
Abstract
The Prisoner's Dilemma has been a subject of extensive research due to its importance in understanding the ever-present tension between individual self-interest and social benefit. A strictly dominant strategy in a Prisoner's Dilemma (defection), when played by both players, is mutually harmful. Repetition of the Prisoner's Dilemma can give rise to cooperation as an equilibrium, but defection is as well, and this ambiguity is difficult to resolve. The numerous behavioral experiments investigating the Prisoner's Dilemma highlight that players often cooperate, but the level of cooperation varies significantly with the specifics of the experimental predicament. We present the first computational model of human behavior in repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games that unifies the diversity of experimental observations in a systematic and quantitatively reliable manner. Our model relies on data we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
