Jam avoidance with autonomous systems
Antoine Tordeux, Sylvain Lassarre

TL;DR
This paper compares autonomous and collective optimal velocity models for highway jam avoidance, finding that collective models with multiple interactions improve stability, but autonomous models with speed difference are often sufficient.
Contribution
It demonstrates that autonomous models with speed difference can achieve comparable stability to collective models with multiple interactions in jam avoidance.
Findings
Collective models with multiple interactions significantly increase stability.
Autonomous models with speed difference are nearly as effective as collective models.
Adding predecessors in collective models enhances stability.
Abstract
Many car-following models are developed for jam avoidance in highways. Two mechanisms are used to improve the stability: feedback control with autonomous models and increasing of the interaction within cooperative ones. In this paper, we compare the linear autonomous and collective optimal velocity (OV) models. We observe that the stability is significantly increased by adding predecessors in interaction with collective models. Yet autonomous and collective approaches are close when the speed difference term is taking into account. Within the linear OV models tested, the autonomous models including speed difference are sufficient to maximise the stability.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTraffic control and management · Transportation Planning and Optimization · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
