Comment on "Search for Muon Neutrino Oscillations with the Irvine-Michigan-Brookhaven Detector"
J.M. LoSecco L.R. Sulak

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous neutrino oscillation study, highlighting that the flux data used was erroneous, which undermines the reliability of the earlier results.
Contribution
It provides a critical comment on prior work, emphasizing the importance of accurate neutrino flux data for reliable oscillation analysis.
Findings
Previous flux data was incorrect
Results of Becker-Szendy et al. are unreliable
Highlights need for accurate neutrino flux measurements
Abstract
The neutrino flux used in Becker-Szendy {\em et al.}\cite{BZ} is now known to be in error. Becker-Szendy {\em et al.}\cite{BZ} depended heavily on the Lee and Koh flux\cite{LeeKoh} which was noted as erroneous in Gaisser {\em et al.}\cite{Bug}. This makes the results of Becker-Szendy {\em et al.}\cite{BZ} unreliable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeutrino Physics Research · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
