Impact of IPv4-IPv6 Coexistence in Cloud Virtualization Environment
Mohammad Aazam, Eui-Nam Huh

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the performance of three IPv6 tunneling techniques—6to4, Teredo, and ISATAP—in cloud virtualization environments, analyzing their impact on network parameters to facilitate IPv4-IPv6 coexistence.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of recent IPv6 tunneling methods in virtualized cloud environments, highlighting their performance across multiple network metrics.
Findings
Teredo shows lowest end-to-end delay among the three techniques.
6to4 achieves higher throughput in virtual networks.
All tunneling methods introduce specific overheads affecting performance.
Abstract
Since January 2011, IPv4 address space has exhausted and IPv6 is taking up the place as successor. Coexistence of IPv4 and IPv6 bears problem of incompatibility, as IPv6 and IPv4 headers are different from each other, thus, cannot interoperate with each other directly. The IPv6 transitioning techniques are still not mature, causing hindrance in the deployment of IPv6 and development of next generation Internet. Until IPv6 completely takes over from IPv4, they will both coexist. For IPv4-IPv6 coexistence, three solutions are possible: a) making every device dual stack, b) translation, c) tunneling. Tunneling stands out as the best possible solution. Among the IPv6 tunneling techniques, this paper evaluates the impact of three recent IPv6 tunneling techniques: 6to4, Teredo, and ISATAP, in cloud virtualization environment. In virtual networks, these protocols were implemented on Microsoft…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
