The Cepheids of NGC1866: A Precise Benchmark for the Extragalactic Distance Scale and Stellar Evolution from Modern UBVI Photometry
I. Musella, M. Marconi, P. B. Stetson, G. Raimondo, E. Brocato, R., Molinaro, V. Ripepi, R. Carini, G. Coppola, A. R. Walker, D. L. Welch

TL;DR
This study uses high-precision multiband photometry of Cepheids in NGC1866 to refine the extragalactic distance scale, analyze stellar evolution, and test theoretical models against empirical data, achieving a highly accurate distance measurement.
Contribution
It provides the first homogeneous, precise dataset of Cepheids in a cluster, compares empirical and theoretical relations, and constrains stellar evolution parameters and cluster age.
Findings
Distance modulus of 18.50 ± 0.01 mag for NGC1866
Age of the cluster approximately 140 million years
Evidence for mild overshooting and moderate mass loss in stellar evolution models
Abstract
We present the analysis of multiband time-series data for a sample of 24 Cepheids in the field of the Large Magellanic Cloud cluster NGC1866. Very accurate BVI VLT photometry is combined with archival UBVI data, covering a large temporal window, to obtain precise mean magnitudes and periods with typical errors of 1-2% and of 1 ppm, respectively. These results represent the first accurate and homogeneous dataset for a substantial sample of Cepheid variables belonging to a cluster and hence sharing common distance, age and original chemical composition. Comparisons of the resulting multiband Period-Luminosity and Wesenheit relations to both empirical and theoretical results for the Large Magellanic Cloud are presented and discussed to derive the distance of the cluster and to constrain the mass-luminosity relation of the Cepheids. The adopted theoretical scenario is also tested by…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
