Assessment of the accuracy of coupled cluster perturbation theory for open-shell systems. II. Quadruples expansions
Janus J. Eriksen, Devin A. Matthews, Poul J{\o}rgensen, J\"urgen Gauss

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of various perturbative coupled cluster models for open-shell systems, highlighting the superior balanced performance of the CCSDT(Q-n) series in recovering energies and atomization data.
Contribution
It introduces and compares higher-order CCSDT(Q-n) models for open-shell systems, demonstrating their improved accuracy and reference-independence over existing models.
Findings
CCSDT(Q-n) models are reference-independent for open-shell systems.
CCSDT(Q-3) offers a cost-effective alternative with high accuracy.
Balanced treatment of closed- and open-shell species is crucial for reliable predictions.
Abstract
We extend our assessment of the potential of perturbative coupled cluster (CC) expansions for a test set of open-shell atoms and organic radicals to the description of quadruple excitations. Namely, the second- through sixth-order models of the recently proposed CCSDT(Q-n) quadruples series [J. Chem. Phys. 140, 064108 (2014)] are compared to the prominent CCSDT(Q) and lambda-CCSDT(Q) models. From a comparison of the models in terms of their recovery of total CC singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples (CCSDTQ) energies, we find that the performance of the CCSDT(Q-n) models is independent of the reference used (unrestricted or restricted (open-shell) Hartree-Fock), in contrast to the CCSDT(Q) and lambda-CCSDT(Q) models, for which the accuracy is strongly dependent on the spin of the molecular ground state. By further comparing the ability of the models to recover relative CCSDTQ…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
