Comparing the Bit-MAP and Block-MAP Decoding Thresholds of Reed-Muller Codes on BMS Channels
Shrinivas Kudekar, Santhosh Kumar, Marco Mondelli, Henry D. Pfister,, R\"udiger Urbanke

TL;DR
This paper investigates the decoding thresholds of Reed-Muller codes on BMS channels, providing a new approach to relate bit-MAP and block-MAP error probabilities, and extends capacity-achieving results beyond erasure channels.
Contribution
It introduces an alternative method based on weight distribution analysis to connect bit-MAP and block-MAP thresholds for Reed-Muller codes on BMS channels.
Findings
Block-MAP error probability converges to 0 if bit-MAP error decays polynomially.
The approach applies to any binary memoryless symmetric channel.
Extends capacity-achieving proofs of Reed-Muller codes beyond erasure channels.
Abstract
The question whether RM codes are capacity-achieving is a long-standing open problem in coding theory that was recently answered in the affirmative for transmission over erasure channels [1], [2]. Remarkably, the proof does not rely on specific properties of RM codes, apart from their symmetry. Indeed, the main technical result consists in showing that any sequence of linear codes, with doubly-transitive permutation groups, achieves capacity on the memoryless erasure channel under bit-MAP decoding. Thus, a natural question is what happens under block-MAP decoding. In [1], [2], by exploiting further symmetries of the code, the bit-MAP threshold was shown to be sharp enough so that the block erasure probability also converges to 0. However, this technique relies heavily on the fact that the transmission is over an erasure channel. We present an alternative approach to strengthen results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
