Morphological Properties of Lyman Alpha Emitters at Redshift 4.86 in the COSMOS Field: Clumpy Star Formation or Merger?
Masakazu A. R. Kobayashi, Katsuhiro L. Murata, Anton M. Koekemoer,, Takashi Murayama, Yoshiaki Taniguchi, Masaru Kajisawa, Yasuhiro Shioya, Nick, Z. Scoville, Tohru Nagao, and Peter L. Capak

TL;DR
This study analyzes the morphological properties of 61 Lyman-alpha emitters at redshift 4.86 in the COSMOS field using HST imaging, revealing diverse sizes, shapes, and potential blending effects, and discusses implications for their star formation and merger status.
Contribution
It provides detailed morphological analysis of high-redshift LAEs, highlighting the effects of PSF broadening and source blending on observed structures, and suggests the need for higher resolution observations.
Findings
Some LAEs are compact, others are extended up to 1.9 kpc.
A positive correlation exists between ellipticity and size, influenced by observational effects.
Many single-component LAEs may actually be multiple blended sources.
Abstract
We investigate morphological properties of 61 Lyman-alpha emitters (LAEs) at z = 4.86 identified in the COSMOS field, based on Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) imaging data in the F814W-band. Out of the 61 LAEs, we find the ACS counterparts for the 54 LAEs. Eight LAEs show double-component structures with a mean projected separation of 0."63 (~ 4.0 kpc at z = 4.86). Considering the faintness of these ACS sources, we carefully evaluate their morphological properties, that is, size and ellipticity. While some of them are compact and indistinguishable from the PSF half-light radius of 0."07 (~ 0.45 kpc), the others are clearly larger than the PSF size and spatially extended up to 0."3 (~ 1.9 kpc). We find that the ACS sources show a positive correlation between ellipticity and size and that the ACS sources with large size and round shape are absent. Our Monte Carlo…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
