Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimation from Stacked Spectroscopic Analysis

TL;DR

This study uses simulated galaxy surveys to evaluate the accuracy of dynamical mass estimates of galaxy clusters from stacked spectroscopic data, accounting for membership, bias, and systematic uncertainties.

Contribution

It introduces a method to accurately estimate cluster masses from stacked spectroscopy, incorporating corrections for mis-centering and velocity bias, validated with simulations.

Findings

Velocity PDF matches observed data.

Halo mass estimates agree within a few percent.

Systematic uncertainties dominate error budget.

Abstract

We use simulated galaxy surveys to study: i) how galaxy membership in redMaPPer clusters maps to the underlying halo population, and ii) the accuracy of a mean dynamical cluster mass, $M_\sigma(\lambda)$, derived from stacked pairwise spectroscopy of clusters with richness $\lambda$. Using $\sim\! 130,000$ galaxy pairs patterned after the SDSS redMaPPer cluster sample study of Rozo et al. (2015 RMIV), we show that the pairwise velocity PDF of central--satellite pairs with $m_i < 19$ in the simulation matches the form seen in RMIV. Through joint membership matching, we deconstruct the main Gaussian velocity component into its halo contributions, finding that the top-ranked halo contributes $\sim 60\%$ of the stacked signal. The halo mass scale inferred by applying the virial scaling of Evrard et al. (2008) to the velocity normalization matches, to within a few percent, the log-mean halo mass derived through galaxy membership matching. We apply this approach, along with mis-centering and galaxy velocity bias corrections, to estimate the log-mean matched halo mass at $z=0.2$ of SDSS redMaPPer clusters. Employing the velocity bias constraints of Guo et al. (2015), we find $\langle \ln(M_{200c})|\lambda \rangle = \ln(M_{30}) + \alpha_m \ln(\lambda/30)$ with $M_{30} = 1.56 \pm 0.35 \times 10^{14} M_\odot$ and $\alpha_m = 1.31 \pm 0.06_{stat} \pm 0.13_{sys}$. Systematic uncertainty in the velocity bias of satellite galaxies overwhelmingly dominates the error budget.