Approaches to relativistic positioning around Earth and error estimations
Neus Puchades, Diego S\'aez

TL;DR
This paper compares errors in relativistic positioning around Earth caused by satellite uncertainties and photon path assumptions, finding that simplified Minkowski space-time models are sufficiently accurate for practical navigation.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison between U-errors and S-errors in satellite-based relativistic positioning, validating the use of Minkowski space-time assumptions for Earth-centered navigation.
Findings
S-errors are smaller than U-errors under realistic conditions.
Simplified Minkowski space-time assumptions are adequate for Earth-centered positioning.
More complex models are unnecessary for typical navigation accuracy.
Abstract
In the context of relativistic positioning, the coordinates of a given user may be calculated by using suitable information broadcast by a 4-tuple of satellites. Our 4-tuples belong to the Galileo constellation. Recently, we estimated the positioning errors due to uncertainties in the satellite world lines (U-errors). A distribution of U-errors was obtained, at various times, in a set of points covering a large region surrounding Earth. Here, the positioning errors associated to the simplifying assumption that photons move in Minkowski space-time (S-errors) are estimated and compared with the U-errors. Both errors have been calculated for the same points and times to make comparisons possible. For a certain realistic modeling of the world line uncertainties, the estimated S-errors have proved to be smaller than the U-errors, which shows that the approach based on the assumption that the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
