Regularization and the small-ball method I: sparse recovery
Guillaume Lecu\'e, Shahar Mendelson

TL;DR
This paper develops a unified framework for analyzing regularization methods in learning, providing new bounds on estimation errors and insights into sparsity and subdifferential properties, extending results for LASSO, SLOPE, and trace norm.
Contribution
It introduces a general approach to bound estimation errors in convex regularization, linking sparsity notions to subdifferential sizes, and extends existing estimates to new regularizers.
Findings
Unified bounds for regularization procedures
Insights into sparsity and subdifferential relationships
Extended estimates for LASSO, SLOPE, and trace norm
Abstract
We obtain bounds on estimation error rates for regularization procedures of the form \begin{equation*} \hat f \in {\rm argmin}_{f\in F}\left(\frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^N\left(Y_i-f(X_i)\right)^2+\lambda \Psi(f)\right) \end{equation*} when is a norm and is convex. Our approach gives a common framework that may be used in the analysis of learning problems and regularization problems alike. In particular, it sheds some light on the role various notions of sparsity have in regularization and on their connection with the size of subdifferentials of in a neighbourhood of the true minimizer. As `proof of concept' we extend the known estimates for the LASSO, SLOPE and trace norm regularization.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
