Understanding the difference in cohesive energies between alpha and beta tin in DFT calculations
Fleur Legrain, Sergei Manzhos

TL;DR
This study investigates the inaccuracies in DFT calculations of tin's alpha and beta phases, demonstrating that applying a Hubbard +U correction improves the accuracy of cohesive energy predictions crucial for technological applications.
Contribution
The paper identifies the source of overestimated energy differences in DFT calculations of tin phases and proposes a correction method using Hubbard +U to achieve accurate cohesive energies.
Findings
DFT with PBE overestimates energy difference by about 0.02 eV/atom.
Errors in s and p band positions cause overstabilization of alpha tin.
Hubbard +U correction effectively improves cohesive energy accuracy.
Abstract
The transition temperature between the low-temperature alpha phase of tin to beta tin is close to the room temperature (Tab =13C), and the difference in cohesive energy of the two phases at 0 K of about dEcoh=0.02 eV/atom is at the limit of the accuracy of DFT (density functional theory) with available exchange-correlation functionals. It is however critically important to model the relative phase energies correctly for any reasonable description of phenomena and technologies involving these phases, for example, the performance of tin electrodes in electrochemical batteries. Here, we show that several commonly used and converged DFT setups using the most practical and widely used PBE functional result in dEcoh of about 0.04 eV/atom, with different types of basis sets and with different models of core electrons (all-electron or pseudopotentials of different types), which leads to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
