Autoreducibility of NP-Complete Sets
John M. Hitchcock, Hadi Shafei

TL;DR
This paper investigates the polynomial-time autoreducibility properties of NP-complete sets under strong hypotheses, revealing separations between different autoreducibility notions and NP-completeness concepts.
Contribution
It establishes new separations between autoreducibility notions for NP-complete sets assuming the existence of p-generic sets in NP and coNP.
Findings
Existence of k-T-complete sets that are k-T autoreducible but not (k-tt) autoreducible.
Existence of k-tt-complete sets that are k-tt autoreducible but not (k-1)-tt or (k-2)-T autoreducible.
Existence of tt-complete sets that are tt-autoreducible but not btt-autoreducible.
Abstract
We study the polynomial-time autoreducibility of NP-complete sets and obtain separations under strong hypotheses for NP. Assuming there is a p-generic set in NP, we show the following: - For every , there is a -T-complete set for NP that is -T autoreducible, but is not -tt autoreducible or -T autoreducible. - For every , there is a -tt-complete set for NP that is -tt autoreducible, but is not -tt autoreducible or -T autoreducible. - There is a tt-complete set for NP that is tt-autoreducible, but is not btt-autoreducible. Under the stronger assumption that there is a p-generic set in NP coNP, we show: - For every , there is a -tt-complete set for NP that is -tt autoreducible, but is not -T autoreducible. Our proofs are based on constructions from separating NP-completeness notions. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
