TL;DR
This paper evaluates various limb-darkening laws for exoplanet transit modeling, recommending the most accurate ones for different scenarios and providing tools to select the optimal law to improve parameter retrieval accuracy.
Contribution
It compares multiple limb-darkening laws beyond the quadratic, offering a method to choose the best law case-by-case and providing code for optimal selection.
Findings
Logarithmic, square-root, and three-parameter laws outperform quadratic and linear laws.
Exponential law is non-physical and should be avoided.
Guidelines and code are provided for selecting the best limb-darkening law.
Abstract
Very precise measurements of exoplanet transit lightcurves both from ground and space based observatories make it now possible to fit the limb-darkening coefficients in the transit-fitting procedure rather than fix them to theoretical values. This strategy has been shown to give better results, as fixing the coefficients to theoretical values can give rise to important systematic errors which directly impact the physical properties of the system derived from such lightcurves such as the planetary radius. However, studies of the effect of limb darkening assumptions on the retrieved parameters have mostly focused on the widely used quadratic limb-darkening law, leaving out other proposed laws that are either simpler or better descriptions of model intensity profiles. In this work, we show that laws such as the logarithmic, square-root and three-parameter law do a better job than the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
