The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Reverberation Mapping Project: An Investigation of Biases in CIV Emission-Line Properties
K. D. Denney, Keith Horne, W. N. Brandt, Luis C. Ho, B. M. Peterson,, Gordon T. Richards, Yue Shen, J. R. Trump, J. Ge

TL;DR
This study assesses how data quality affects measurements of CIV emission lines in high-redshift quasars, revealing increased systematic biases at lower S/N ratios and identifying the most robust line-width metrics.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of biases in CIV emission-line measurements from SDSS quasar spectra, highlighting the impact of data quality and recommending robust characterization methods.
Findings
Systematic offsets increase as S/N decreases.
MAD is the most robust line-width measure.
Offsets in FWHM are smaller than uncertainties only at S/N>10.
Abstract
We investigate the dependence on data quality of quasar properties measured from the CIV emission line region at high redshifts. Our measurements come from 32 epochs of Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Reverberation Mapping Project spectroscopic observations of 482 z>1.46 quasars. We compare the differences between measurements made from the single-epoch and coadded spectra, focusing on the CIV emission line because of its importance for studies of high-redshift quasar demographics and physical properties, including black hole masses. In addition to statistical errors increasing (by factors of ~2-4), we find increasing systematic offsets with decreasing S/N. The systematic difference (measurement uncertainty) in our lowest S/N (<5) subsample between the single-epoch and coadded spectrum (i) CIV equivalent width is 17A (31A), (ii) centroid wavelength is <1A (2A), and fractional velocity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
