Tracing Digital Footprints to Academic Articles: An Investigation of PeerJ Publication Referral Data
Xianwen Wang, Shenmeng Xu, Zhichao Fang

TL;DR
This study analyzes referral data for PeerJ articles, revealing that over half of visits come from external sources like search engines, social media, and news, with Google being the dominant referrer.
Contribution
It introduces a novel analysis of referral patterns to academic articles, highlighting the significant role of search engines and social media in scholarly article visits.
Findings
57% visits from external sources
Google is the primary referral source
Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter drive traffic
Abstract
In this study, we propose a novel way to explore the patterns of people's visits to academic articles. About 3.4 million links to referral source of visitors of 1432 papers published in the journal of PeerJ are collected and analyzed. We find that at least 57% visits are from external referral sources, among which General Search Engine, Social Network, and News & Blog are the top three categories of referrals. Academic Resource, including academic search engines and academic publishers' sites, is the fourth largest category of referral sources. In addition, our results show that Google contributes significantly the most in directing people to scholarly articles. This encompasses the usage of Google the search engine, Google Scholar the academic search engine, and diverse specific country domains of them. Focusing on similar disciplines to PeerJ's publication scope, NCBI is the academic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Wikis in Education and Collaboration · Web visibility and informetrics
