Machine Protection
R. Schmidt (CERN)

TL;DR
This paper reviews the design and implementation of machine protection systems in high-power accelerators, emphasizing the importance of monitoring, safety interlocks, and failure anticipation to prevent equipment damage.
Contribution
It provides an overview of accelerator protection requirements and systems, with examples from LHC, SNS, and ESS, highlighting recent advances and challenges.
Findings
Protection systems are crucial for preventing equipment damage.
High-energy accelerators require sophisticated monitoring and interlock systems.
Examples from LHC, SNS, and ESS illustrate current protection strategies.
Abstract
The protection of accelerator equipment is as old as accelerator technology and was for many years related to high-power equipment. Examples are the protection of powering equipment from overheating (magnets, power converters, high-current cables), of superconducting magnets from damage after a quench and of klystrons. The protection of equipment from beam accidents is more recent. It is related to the increasing beam power of high-power proton accelerators such as ISIS, SNS, ESS and the PSI cyclotron, to the emission of synchrotron light by electron-positron accelerators and FELs, and to the increase of energy stored in the beam (in particular for hadron colliders such as LHC). Designing a machine protection system requires an excellent understanding of accelerator physics and operation to anticipate possible failures that could lead to damage. Machine protection includes beam and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics · Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
