Repeatability and Accuracy of Exoplanet Eclipse Depths Measured with Post-Cryogenic Spitzer
James G. Ingalls, J. E. Krick, S. J. Carey, John R. Stauffer, Patrick, J. Lowrance, Carl J. Grillmair, Derek Buzasi, Drake Deming, Hannah, Diamond-Lowe, Thomas M. Evans, G. Morello, Kevin B. Stevenson, Ian Wong,, Peter Capak, William Glaccum, Seppo Laine, Jason Surace, Lisa

TL;DR
This study evaluates the repeatability and accuracy of exoplanet eclipse depth measurements with Spitzer IRAC, demonstrating that current methods can achieve near photon-limited precision and reliably assess measurement errors.
Contribution
The paper compares seven noise removal techniques, showing that three methods achieve results within three times the photon noise limit and that most methods accurately estimate their errors.
Findings
Eclipse depth estimates are repeatable within 156 ppm across epochs.
Most techniques' error estimates match the scatter in measurements.
Three methods achieve results within three times the photon limit of the true eclipse depth.
Abstract
We examine the repeatability, reliability, and accuracy of differential exoplanet eclipse depth measurements made using the InfraRed Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope during the post-cryogenic mission. We have re-analyzed an existing 4.5 {\mu}m data set, consisting of 10 observations of the XO-3b system during secondary eclipse, using seven different techniques for removing correlated noise. We find that, on average, for a given technique, the eclipse depth estimate is repeatable from epoch to epoch to within 156 parts per million (ppm). Most techniques derive eclipse depths that do not vary by more than a factor 3 of the photon noise limit. All methods but one accurately assess their own errors: for these methods, the individual measurement uncertainties are comparable to the scatter in eclipse depths over the 10 epoch sample. To assess the accuracy of the techniques…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
