Frequency ratio of Yb and Sr clocks with $5 \times 10^{-17}$ uncertainty at 150 s averaging time
Nils Nemitz, Takuya Ohkubo, Masao Takamoto, Ichiro Ushijima, Manoj, Das, Noriaki Ohmae, Hidetoshi Katori

TL;DR
This paper reports a highly precise measurement of the frequency ratio between Ytterbium and Strontium optical clocks, achieving a fractional uncertainty of 4.6×10⁻¹⁷ with significantly reduced averaging time, advancing the accuracy of fundamental frequency comparisons.
Contribution
The study demonstrates a 90-fold reduction in averaging time for frequency ratio measurements by using high-stability optical lattice clocks, improving precision over previous single-ion clock comparisons.
Findings
Achieved a fractional uncertainty of 4.6×10⁻¹⁷ in Yb/Sr frequency ratio.
Reduced averaging time by a factor of 90 compared to previous measurements.
Measured the ratio as R = 1.207507039343337749(55).
Abstract
Transition frequencies of atoms and ions are among the most accurately accessible quantities in nature, playing important roles in pushing the frontiers of science by testing fundamental laws of physics, in addition to a wide range of applications such as satellite navigation systems. Atomic clocks based on optical transitions approach uncertainties of , where full frequency descriptions are far beyond the reach of the SI second. Frequency ratios of such super clocks, on the other hand, are not subject to this limitation. They can therefore verify consistency and overall accuracy for an ensemble of super clocks, an essential step towards a redefinition of the second. However, with the measurement stabilities so far reported for such frequency ratios, a confirmation to uncertainty would require an averaging time of multiple months. Here we report a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
