Limits on momentum-dependent asymmetric dark matter with CRESST-II
G. Angloher, A. Bento, C. Bucci, L. Canonica, X. Defay, A. Erb, F. v., Feilitzsch, N. Ferreiro Iachellini, P. Gorla, A. G\"utlein, D. Hauff, J., Jochum, M. Kiefer, H. Kluck, H. Kraus, J.-C. Lanfranchi, J. Loebell, A., M\"unster, C. Pagliarone, F. Petricca, W. Potzel, F. Pr\"obst

TL;DR
This paper uses CRESST-II data to constrain momentum-dependent asymmetric dark matter models, ruling out previously suggested best-fit parameters for light dark matter particles around 3 GeV/c^2.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental constraints on momentum-dependent asymmetric dark matter models using cryogenic detector data.
Findings
CRESST-II data rules out the proposed best-fit dark matter parameters.
Constraints are placed on models with light dark matter particles and momentum-dependent interactions.
The low energy threshold enhances sensitivity to light dark matter recoils.
Abstract
The usual assumption in direct dark matter searches is to only consider the spin-dependent or spin-independent scattering of dark matter particles. However, especially in models with light dark matter particles , operators which carry additional powers of the momentum transfer can become dominant. One such model based on asymmetric dark matter has been invoked to overcome discrepancies in helioseismology and an indication was found for a particle with preferred mass of 3 and cross section of . Recent data from the CRESST-II experiment, which uses cryogenic detectors based on to search for nuclear recoils induced by dark matter particles, are used to constrain these momentum-dependent models. The low energy threshold of 307 eV for nuclear recoils of the detector used, allows us to rule out…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
