X-ray absorption, nuclear infrared emission and dust covering factors of AGN: testing Unification Schemes
S. Mateos, F. J. Carrera, A. Alonso-Herrero, A. Hern\'an-Caballero, X., Barcons, A. Asensio Ramos, M. G. Watson, A. Blain, A. Caccianiga, L. Ballo,, V. Braito, C. Ramos Almeida

TL;DR
This study investigates the geometrical covering factors of AGN dusty tori using X-ray and infrared data, revealing differences between AGN types and supporting unification models based on viewing angle and luminosity.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of torus covering factors across a large, diverse AGN sample using multi-wavelength data and clumpy torus models.
Findings
Type 2 AGN have higher average torus covering factors than type 1 AGN.
Approximately 20% of type 1 and 23-28% of type 2 AGN have extreme covering factors.
Covering factor decreases with increasing AGN luminosity, supporting receding torus models.
Abstract
We present the distributions of geometrical covering factors of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) dusty tori (f2) using an X-ray selected complete sample of 227 AGN drawn from the Bright Ultra-hard XMM-Newton Survey. The AGN have z from 0.05 to 1.7, 2-10 keV luminosities between 10^42 and 10^46 erg/s and Compton-thin X-ray absorption. Employing data from UKIDSS, 2MASS and the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer in a previous work we determined the rest-frame 1-20 microns continuum emission from the torus which we model here with the clumpy torus models of Nenkova et al. Optically classified type 1 and type 2 AGN are intrinsically different, with type 2 AGN having on average tori with higher f2 than type 1 AGN. Nevertheless, ~20 per cent of type 1 AGN have tori with large covering factors while ~23-28 per cent of type 2 AGN have tori with small covering factors. Low f2 are preferred at high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
