Some algebraic equivalent forms of $\mathbb{R} \subseteq L$
Silvia Steila

TL;DR
This paper explores algebraic forms related to the Continuum Hypothesis within a definability framework, showing their equivalence to the statement that all reals are constructible.
Contribution
It introduces $oldsymbol{ ext{Σ}}^1_2$ definable versions of algebraic forms of the Continuum Hypothesis and proves their equivalence to the constructibility of all reals.
Findings
All considered algebraic forms are equivalent to 'all reals are constructible'
$oldsymbol{ ext{Σ}}^1_2$ definable counterparts mirror classical algebraic forms
The results connect definability with classical set-theoretic hypotheses
Abstract
We study definable counterparts for some algebraic equivalent forms of the Continuum Hypothesis. All turn out to be equivalent to "all reals are constructible".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
