Million-Body Star Cluster Simulations: Comparisons between Monte Carlo and Direct $N$-body
Carl L. Rodriguez, Meagan Morscher, Long Wang, Sourav Chatterjee,, Frederic A. Rasio, Rainer Spurzem

TL;DR
This study compares million-body globular cluster simulations using Monte Carlo and direct N-body methods, finding excellent agreement and confirming black hole retention in old clusters, validating the faster Monte Carlo approach.
Contribution
First detailed comparison showing Monte Carlo and direct N-body simulations produce consistent results for million-body globular clusters with realistic physics.
Findings
Both models retain large numbers of stellar-mass black holes for 12 Gyr.
Monte Carlo simulations are capable of accurately modeling long-term cluster evolution.
Minor differences are due to small-N dynamics, but overall agreement is very high.
Abstract
We present the first detailed comparison between million-body globular cluster simulations computed with a H\'enon-type Monte Carlo code, CMC, and a direct -body code, NBODY6++GPU. Both simulations start from an identical cluster model with particles, and include all of the relevant physics needed to treat the system in a highly realistic way. With the two codes "frozen" (no fine-tuning of any free parameters or internal algorithms of the codes) we find excellent agreement in the overall evolution of the two models. Furthermore, we find that in both models, large numbers of stellar-mass black holes (> 1000) are retained for 12 Gyr. Thus, the very accurate direct -body approach confirms recent predictions that black holes can be retained in present-day, old globular clusters. We find only minor disagreements between the two models and attribute these to the small-…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
