Lattice specific heat for the RMIn$_5$ (R = Gd, La, Y, M = Co, Rh) compounds: non-magnetic contribution subtraction
Jorge I. Facio, D. Betancourth, N. R. Cejas Bolecek, G. A. Jorge,, Pablo Pedrazzini, V. F. Correa, Pablo S. Cornaglia, V. Vildosola, D. J., Garc\'ia

TL;DR
This paper develops a theoretical method to accurately subtract lattice contributions from specific heat measurements of magnetic materials, using density functional theory to identify optimal non-magnetic analogs across temperature ranges.
Contribution
It introduces a computational approach to select the best non-magnetic analogs for specific heat subtraction, improving the accuracy of magnetic contribution analysis in rare-earth compounds.
Findings
YRhIn$_5$ closely matches GdCoIn$_5$ across all temperatures
LaCoIn$_5$ better approximates GdRhIn$_5$ due to mass and volume effects
Including anharmonic effects aligns theory with experimental specific heat data
Abstract
We analyze theoretically a common experimental process used to obtain the magnetic contribution to the specific heat of a given magnetic material. In the procedure, the specific heat of a non-magnetic analog is measured and used to subtract the non-magnetic contributions, which are generally dominated by the lattice degrees of freedom in a wide range of temperatures. We calculate the lattice contribution to the specific heat for the magnetic compounds GdMIn (M = Co, Rh) and for the non-magnetic YMIn and LaMIn (M = Co, Rh), using density functional theory based methods. We find that the best non-magnetic analog for the subtraction depends on the magnetic material and on the range of temperatures. While the phonon specific heat contribution of YRhIn is an excellent approximation to the one of GdCoIn in the full temperature range, for GdRhIn we find a better…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
