On the strength of a weak variant of the Axiom of Counting
Zachiri McKenzie

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that a weak variant of the Axiom of Counting within a modified set theory proves the consistency of the Simple Theory of Types with Infinity, linking it to the consistency of related set theories.
Contribution
It shows that a specific weak form of the Axiom of Counting can prove the consistency of TSTI within a modified NFU framework.
Findings
NFU^{-AC} + AxCount_≥ proves TSTI's consistency
NF + AxCount_≥ proves TSTI's consistency
NFU^{-AC} + AxCount_≥ proves NFU^{-AC}'s consistency
Abstract
In this paper is used to denote Ronald Jensen's modification of Quine's `New Foundations' Set Theory () fortified with a type-level pairing function but without the Axiom of Choice. The axiom is the variant of the Axiom of Counting which asserts that no finite set is smaller than its own set of singletons. This paper shows that proves the consistency of the Simple Theory of Types with Infinity (). This result implies that proves that consistency of , and that proves the consistency of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
