Orbital Simulations on Deflecting Near-Earth Objects by Directed Energy
Qicheng Zhang, Kevin J. Walsh, Carl Melis, Gary B. Hughes, Philip M., Lubin

TL;DR
This paper uses orbital simulations to compare the effectiveness of stand-off and stand-on directed energy systems in deflecting Near-Earth Objects via laser ablation, highlighting key parameters influencing deflection success.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive simulation framework for assessing laser-based NEO deflection systems, analyzing how thrust, duration, and direction affect deflection outcomes.
Findings
Deflection distance scales with thrust magnitude and square of ablation duration.
Optimal thrust direction varies with laser activity duration.
A 20 kW stand-on system can deflect a 325 m asteroid by 2 Earth radii if started 15 years in advance.
Abstract
Laser ablation of a Near-Earth Object (NEO) on a collision course with Earth produces a cloud of ejecta which exerts a thrust on the NEO, deflecting it from its original trajectory. Ablation may be performed from afar by illuminating an Earth-targeting asteroid or comet with a stand-off "DE- STAR" system consisting of a large phased-array laser in Earth orbit. Alternatively, a much smaller stand-on "DE-STARLITE" system may travel alongside the target, slowly deflecting it from nearby over a long period. This paper presents orbital simulations comparing the effectiveness of both systems across a range of laser and NEO parameters. Simulated parameters include magnitude, duration and, for the stand-on system, direction of the thrust, as well as the type, size and orbital characteristics of the target NEO. These simulations indicate that deflection distance is approximately proportional to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
