Growth against entropy in bacterial metabolism: the phenotypic trade-off behind empirical growth rate distributions in E. coli
Daniele De Martino, Fabrizio Capuani, Andrea De Martino

TL;DR
This paper explains the distribution of bacterial growth rates by modeling a trade-off between the fitness advantage of fast growth and the entropy of slow-growing phenotypes, using genome-scale metabolic models of E. coli.
Contribution
It introduces a minimal evolutionary model capturing the phenotypic trade-off in bacterial growth, linking empirical distributions to metabolic network properties.
Findings
Empirical growth rate distributions can be explained by a fitness-entropy trade-off.
Scaling relationships reflect the distance from maximum growth rate and phenotypic change rate.
Genome-scale models provide insights into bacterial growth phenotypes.
Abstract
The solution space of genome-scale models of cellular metabolism provides a map between physically viable flux configurations and cellular metabolic phenotypes described, at the most basic level, by the corresponding growth rates. By sampling the solution space of E. coli's metabolic network, we show that empirical growth rate distributions recently obtained in experiments at single-cell resolution can be explained in terms of a trade-off between the higher fitness of fast-growing phenotypes and the higher entropy of slow-growing ones. Based on this, we propose a minimal model for the evolution of a large bacterial population that captures this trade-off. The scaling relationships observed in experiments encode, in such frameworks, for the same distance from the maximum achievable growth rate, the same degree of growth rate maximization, and/or the same rate of phenotypic change. Being…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
