Is Nonlocality of the Quantum Theory Definitively Confirmed by the Experiments ?

TL;DR

The paper critically examines recent experiments claiming to definitively confirm quantum nonlocality, arguing that the evidence may not be conclusive and suggesting the need for different experimental approaches.

Contribution

The paper challenges the conclusiveness of recent Bell test experiments and proposes that alternative experiments are necessary to definitively confirm quantum nonlocality.

Findings

Recent experiments claim to close loopholes in Bell tests

The author questions the conclusiveness of these experiments

Different experimental designs may be needed for definitive proof

Abstract

In a recent paper published last october 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [1] and in two companion papers published last december 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [2] and by L. Shalm et al. [3], the authors describe beautiful and complex experiments aimed at testing the theorem of J. Bell (1965) [4] with measurements free of the detection-loophole and the locality loophole that had never been closed unquestionably in a single experiment. According to their authors, each experiment, closing both loopholes, gives conclusive evidence in favor of nonlocality. Here I will argue that this claim may be questionable, and that such an evidence should be obtained by a different kind of experiments.