Infrared Continuum and Line Evolution of the Equatorial Ring around SN 1987A
Richard G. Arendt, Eli Dwek, Patrice Bouchet, I. John Danziger, Kari, A. Frank, Robert D. Gehrz, Sangwook Park, Charles E. Woodward

TL;DR
This study tracks the long-term infrared emission from SN 1987A's equatorial ring, revealing dust destruction and emission line evolution over more than a decade, with implications for understanding shock interactions and dust survival.
Contribution
It provides the longest infrared observational record of SN 1987A's equatorial ring, highlighting dust destruction timelines and detailed IR emission line evolution.
Findings
Infrared brightness at 3.6 and 4.5 microns has faded after day ~8,500.
IR emission lines evolution is consistent with optical emission but shows peculiar velocity structures.
Dust in the equatorial ring is destroyed on timescales shorter than the gas cooling time.
Abstract
Spitzer observations of SN 1987A have now spanned more than a decade. Since day ~4,000, mid-infrared (mid-IR) emission has been dominated by that from shock-heated dust in the equatorial ring (ER). From 6,000 to 8,000 days after the explosion, Spitzer observations included broadband photometry at 3.6 - 24 micron, and low and moderate resolution spectroscopy at 5 - 35 micron. Here we present later Spitzer observations, through day 10,377, which include only the broadband measurements at 3.6 and 4.5 micron. These data show that the 3.6 and 4.5 micron brightness has clearly begun to fade after day ~8,500, and no longer tracks the X-ray emission as well as it did at earlier epochs. This can be explained by the destruction of the dust in the ER on time scales shorter than the cooling time for the shocked gas. We find that the evolution of the late time IR emission is also similar to the now…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
