The optical-UV emissivity of quasars: dependence on black hole mass and radio loudness
Francesco Shankar (1), Giorgio Calderone (2), Christian Knigge (1),, James Matthews (1), Rachel Buckland (1), Krzysztof Hryniewicz (3), Gregory, Sivakoff (4), Xinyu Dai (5), Kayleigh Richardson (1), Jack Riley (1), James, Gray (1), Fabio La Franca (6), Diego Altamirano (1)

TL;DR
This study compares quasar UV-optical spectra with accretion disk models, finding no clear dependence of continuum slopes on black hole mass, luminosity, or radio loudness, challenging some theoretical predictions.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale observational test of accretion disk model predictions regarding quasar continuum slopes across different black hole and radio properties.
Findings
No significant dependence of alpha_3000 on black hole mass or luminosity.
Radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars have similar or redder slopes than models predict.
Weak redshift evolution of continuum slopes observed up to z~1.2.
Abstract
We analyzed a large sample of radio-loud and radio-quiet quasar spectra at redshift 1.0 < z < 1.2 to compare the inferred underlying quasar continuum slopes (after removal of the host galaxy contribution) with accretion disk models. The latter predict redder (decreasing) alpha_3000 continuum slopes (L_\nu~\nu^alpha at 3000Ang) with increasing black hole mass, bluer alpha_3000 with increasing luminosity at 3000Ang, and bluer alpha_3000 with increasing spin of the black hole, when all other parameters are held fixed. We find no clear evidence for any of these predictions in the data. In particular we find that: (i) alpha_3000 shows no significant dependence on black hole mass or luminosity. Dedicated Monte Carlo tests suggest that the substantial observational uncertainties in the black hole virial masses can effectively erase any intrinsic dependence of alpha_3000 on black hole mass, in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
