A New Star-Formation Rate Calibration from Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Emission Features and Application to High Redshift Galaxies
Heath V. Shipley, Casey Papovich, George H. Rieke, Michael J. I., Brown, John Moustakas

TL;DR
This paper establishes a new calibration method using PAH emission features at 6.2, 7.7, and 11.3 microns as reliable indicators of star-formation rates in galaxies, applicable to high-redshift observations with JWST.
Contribution
The study introduces a novel PAH-based SFR calibration that is minimally affected by extinction and applicable to distant galaxies, enhancing the tools for studying cosmic star formation history.
Findings
PAH luminosity correlates linearly with SFR across a wide luminosity range.
The PAH SFR relation is affected by metallicity, for which an empirical correction is provided.
PAH features can be used with JWST to measure SFRs in high-redshift galaxies.
Abstract
We calibrate the integrated luminosity from the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) features at 6.2\micron, 7.7\micron\ and 11.3\micron\ in galaxies as a measure of the star-formation rate (SFR). These features are strong (containing as much as 5-10\% of the total infrared luminosity) and suffer minimal extinction. Our calibration uses \spitzer\ Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) measurements of 105 galaxies at , infrared (IR) luminosities of , combined with other well-calibrated SFR indicators. The PAH luminosity correlates linearly with the SFR as measured by the extinction-corrected \ha\ luminosity over the range of luminosities in our calibration sample. The scatter is 0.14 dex comparable to that between SFRs derived from the \paa\ and extinction-corrected \ha\ emission lines, implying the PAH features may be as accurate a SFR indicator as hydrogen…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
