Highlighting Impact and the Impact of Highlighting: PRB Editors' Suggestions
Manolis Antonoyiannakis

TL;DR
This paper examines how the process of highlighting certain papers as Editors' Suggestions correlates with increased and sustained citation impact, emphasizing the importance of editorial selection in scientific publishing.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of the impact of highlighting papers as Editors' Suggestions on their citation metrics and influence in their fields.
Findings
Highlighted papers have significantly higher citation impact.
The elevated impact persists over time.
Editorial selection influences paper visibility and recognition.
Abstract
Associate Editor Manolis Antonoyiannakis discusses the highlighting, as Editors' Suggestions, of a small percentage of the papers published each week. We highlight papers primarily for their importance and impact in their respective fields, or because we find them particularly interesting or elegant. It turns out that the additional layer of scrutiny involved in the selection of papers as Editors' Suggestions is associated with a significantly elevated and sustained citation impact.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
