Testing Asteroseismic Scaling Relations using Eclipsing Binaries in Star Clusters and the Field
K. Brogaard, J. Jessen-Hansen, R. Handberg, T. Arentoft, S. Frandsen,, F. Grundahl, H. Bruntt, E.L. Sandquist, A. Miglio, P.G. Beck, A.O. Thygesen,, K.L. Kj{\ae}rgaard, and N.A. Haugaard

TL;DR
This study compares classical eclipsing binary measurements with asteroseismic data for giant stars in clusters and the field, revealing small but significant systematic differences and highlighting complexities in age estimation due to binary evolution.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive comparison of asteroseismic scaling relations with classical measurements for giant stars in clusters and the field, identifying systematic discrepancies.
Findings
Small systematic differences between classical and asteroseismic measurements.
Evidence of binary evolution effects complicating age estimates.
Quantitative estimates of blue straggler star fractions in clusters.
Abstract
The accuracy of stellar masses and radii determined from asteroseismology is not known! We examine this issue for giant stars by comparing classical measurements of detached eclipsing binary systems (dEBs) with asteroseismic measurements from the Kepler mission. For star clusters, we extrapolate measurements of dEBs in the turn-off region to the red giant branch and the red clump where we investigate the giants as an ensemble. For the field stars, we measure dEBs with an oscillating giant component. These measurements allow a comparison of masses and radii calculated from a classical eclipsing binary analysis to those calculated from asteroseismic scaling relations and/or other asteroseismic methods. Our first results indicate small but significant systematic differences between the classical and asteroseismic measurements. In this contribution we show our latest results and summarize…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
