Hidden Symmetries and Commensurability of 2-Bridge Link Complements
Christian Millichap, William Worden

TL;DR
This paper proves that non-arithmetic hyperbolic 2-bridge link complements lack hidden symmetries, characterizes their commensurability classes, and explores implications for 3-manifold topology using tiling analysis.
Contribution
It establishes the absence of hidden symmetries in non-arithmetic hyperbolic 2-bridge link complements and classifies their commensurability with only two known examples.
Findings
Non-arithmetic hyperbolic 2-bridge link complements have no hidden symmetries.
The only commensurable hyperbolic 2-bridge link complements are the figure-eight knot and the 6_2^2 link.
Hyperbolic 2-bridge link complements cannot irregularly cover other hyperbolic 3-manifolds.
Abstract
In this paper, we show that any non-arithmetic hyperbolic -bridge link complement admits no hidden symmetries. As a corollary, we conclude that a hyperbolic -bridge link complement cannot irregularly cover a hyperbolic -manifold. By combining this corollary with the work of Boileau and Weidmann, we obtain a characterization of -manifolds with non-trivial JSJ-decomposition and rank two fundamental groups. We also show that the only commensurable hyperbolic -bridge link complements are the figure-eight knot complement and the link complement. Our work requires a careful analysis of the tilings of that come from lifting the canonical triangulations of the cusps of hyperbolic -bridge link complements.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
